Blog
How to Cut 10% of Your Word Count Without Losing Meaning
Good writing often begins with the "delete" key. This guide explores the "Kill Your Darlings" philosophy, specifically within the high-stakes constraints of flash fiction. By auditing filler words, redundant phrasing, and excessive tagging, writers can shed 10% of their word count to uncover a leaner, more impactful, and professional narrative.
Cut! Cut! Cut!
Kill Your Darlings!
You’ve heard this phrase before. As a writer, you must ruthlessly cut beloved scenes, characters, or phrases that do not serve the story. If a scene or phrase is self-indulgent, if it disrupts pacing, or if it doesn't move the story forward, it must be removed, even if it breaks your heart.
The Importance of Cutting in Flash Fiction
In flash fiction, every word must justify its presence. With limited space to establish character, conflict, and consequence, excess language becomes a liability rather than a luxury.
Cutting words without losing meaning sharpens imagery, accelerates pacing, and clarifies intent. When sentences are stripped to a precise form, each line carries greater weight, allowing implication and subtext to do the work of explanation.
Cutting forces the writer to choose details that matter and discard those that are merely decorative. The result is a voice that feels immediate and deliberate. In a form where a single paragraph can determine emotional impact, lean writing is necessary.
In my experience, most drafts can lose ten percent of their word count without losing a single idea right out of the gate. In fact, I feel trimming excess almost always makes writing clearer, sharper, and more professional. The key is knowing what to cut.
Filler Words (Ticks and Gnats)
Start with filler words — words that simply annoy, that accompany the hair on the dog but aren’t the dog themselves.
Terms like very, really, just, quite, and somewhat rarely add meaning. In fact, they soften sentences and dilute impact. Replace “very tired” with “exhausted.” Replace “really big” with “massive.” Precision eliminates extra words automatically.
Redundant Words, Phrases, and Expressions
Next, look for redundancy. Writers often repeat the same idea in different ways throughout a piece. If one sentence explains something clearly, you don’t need a second sentence to restate it. Trust the reader to understand the first time.
Unnecessary Tagging
Watch for unnecessary dialogue tags. If only two characters are speaking, constant reminders of who is talking become clutter. Similarly, not every nod, shrug, or glance needs to be documented. Critically, what value does “He nodded” offer the story? Think about it. Keep only actions that reveal character or advance the scene.
Tighten Phrasing
Tighten phrases wherever possible. Longer expressions can be reduced without losing meaning:
“In order to” becomes “to”
“At this point in time” becomes “now”
“Due to the fact that” becomes “because”
Tamp Your Descriptions
Description is another place to trim. Keep details that create mood, characterize, generate atmosphere, elevate tension, or advance the story. If they don’t do those things, then what’s their function? Cut descriptions that serve only to decorate the page. Readers need clarity and momentum more than exhaustive inventory.
Read It Aloud
Read your work aloud. Your ear will catch repetition, sluggish phrasing, and unnecessary detours faster than your eyes. If a sentence feels too long, it probably is.
Summarizing vs Dramatizing
Writers of flash fiction must also guard against excessive narrative compression that reduces the story to a summary rather than an experience. When too much is explained in too little space, scenes collapse into exposition where a long-winded author tells you what’s going on instead of witnessing it unfold.
Summary can efficiently move time forward, but dramatization creates emotional impact. Even in very short work, readers need at least one moment rendered in real time — through action, dialogue, or sensory detail — so they can feel the stakes rather than understand them. Compression should sharpen a story, not flatten it. If every event is condensed into an explanation, the narrative may become clear but emotionally distant, sacrificing immediacy for efficiency.
Cutting ten percent isn’t about removing substance. It’s about removing what doesn’t serve the story. Leaner prose moves faster, sounds stronger, and keeps attention where it belongs: on the story itself.
So go on: kill your darlings. Be ruthless.
R
Common Dialogue Punctuation Mistakes (Even Good Writers Make)
Dialogue is the most effective tool for immediately hooking a reader, provided the mechanics don't get in the way. By emphasizing that dialogue should appear as early as the first or second line of a story, the piece shifts into a masterclass on the technical precision required to keep readers immersed.
I feel dialogue is one of the fastest ways to pull a reader into a story. In fact, I feel that dialogue is so important that it should be seen on the first line, and if not on the first line, by the second line. The longer you lead with narrative exposition, the more time you’re stealing from the star of your show.
Dialogue, however, is one of the easiest places to lose a reader. Even seasoned writers stumble over the mechanics of punctuating speech. The rules aren’t difficult, but they must be applied consistently.
The Placement of Commas Within Dialogue Tags
The most common mistake. When a line of dialogue is followed by a tag such as "he said" or "she asked," the sentence usually ends with a comma inside the quotation marks, not a period.
Incorrect:
“I can’t believe you did that.” she said.
Correct:
“I can’t believe you did that,” she said.
Capitalizing the Tag
Another frequent error I find is where the author capitalizes the dialogue tag. Dialogue tags are part of the same sentence and should remain lowercase unless they include a proper noun.
Incorrect:
“Meet me at noon,” He said.
Correct:
“Meet me at noon,” he said.
A good example of where the capitalization would be applied is with a proper noun:
“Let there be light!” He said. [We’re referring to God here; pronouns are always capitalized]
“Look what I found,” Cindy said.
Action vs. Attribution
I find writers often confuse dialogue tags with actions. A dialogue tag attributes the dialogue to a speaker (“she said,” “he asked”), while an action beat might describe what the character is doing. These are two separate things. Actions stand as separate sentences and should be punctuated accordingly.
Incorrect:
“I’m leaving now,” he slammed the door.
Correct:
“I’m leaving now.” He slammed the door.
Notice the ‘full stop’ there. The dialogue is delivered. Period — full stop — then it’s followed by an action sentence. In the incorrect version, the action “he slammed the door” doesn’t say “I’m leaving now.”
Placement of Punctuation
Quotation marks create additional trouble. In US English, periods and commas almost always go inside quotation marks, while colons and semicolons stay outside. Question marks and exclamation points depend on whether they belong to the dialogue or the overall sentence. Let’s work through a couple of examples.
Periods and commas inside quotation marks (US English):
She said, “We’ll finish this tomorrow.”
“I don’t agree,” he replied.
Colon and semicolon outside quotation marks:
He gave one instruction: “Stay quiet.”
She called it “a minor setback”; he called it a disaster.
Question mark depends on meaning:
Did she really say, “I’m leaving”?
She asked, “Are you coming with me?”
Exclamation point depends on meaning:
He shouted, “Watch out!”
I can’t believe she called that plan “brilliant”!
Finally, be consistent with formatting. Inconsistency is a distraction.
Quotation Mark Style. Use either double quotation marks (standard in US fiction) or single quotation marks (common in UK fiction) consistently throughout the manuscript. Do not switch between them.
Placement of Dialogue Tags. Maintain consistent punctuation with dialogue tags: place commas inside quotation marks when they follow tags, and capitalize tags. Avoid alternating between correct and incorrect forms.
Paragraph Breaks for Speakers. Start a new paragraph every time the speaker changes. Never allow multiple speakers to share the same paragraph unless stylistically intentional and clear.
Use of Action vs. Dialogue Tags. Treat action beats as separate sentences and punctuate them consistently. Do not alternate randomly between comma-tag structures and period-action structures.
Internal Thoughts Formatting. If using italics, quotation marks, or free indirect style for thoughts, choose one method and apply it consistently throughout the work.
Interruptions and Dashes. Use em dashes consistently for interrupted speech and ellipses consistently for trailing or fading dialogue. Do not interchange them without purpose.
Handling of Questions and Exclamations. Ensure question marks and exclamation points follow consistent logic depending on whether they belong to the dialogue or the surrounding sentence.
Dialogue Tag Vocabulary. Maintain consistency in style, either by primarily using simple tags (said, asked) or by intentionally varying tags. Avoid erratic shifts in approach.
Formatting of Long Speeches. If a character speaks across multiple paragraphs, use consistent formatting (opening quotation marks on each paragraph, closing only at the end of the speech).
Spacing and Typography. Maintain consistent spacing around quotation marks, punctuation, and paragraph breaks to ensure professional presentation and readability.
Strong dialogue relies on clarity. Basic punctuation ensures your reader never pauses to decode who is speaking — distracting them from the read — and remains immersed in what your characters have to say.
R